Many processing tools are duplicates. For example, If I filter for
"buffer" I find 13 results in QGIS, GDAL, SAGA and GRASS libraries.
Since these last 3 are external projects, QGIS cannot control which
tools are in there. And why should "somebody at QGIS" choose for you and
everybody else which tools to use or not.
Besides, I'm often happy having a backup tool when the first one I try
doesn't like my data for some reason.
So go ahead, pick the one you prefer and use it.
Raymond
On 17-03-17 22:49, johnrobot wrote:
I noticed that there seems to be two tools (GDAL and QGIS) for reprojecting
data in Processing. Do we really need two separate tools? Why not merge
them?
Regards,
Magnus
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Processing-Duplicate-tools-for-reprojecting-tp5312941.html
Sent from the QGIS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
