Hi, Il 28/03/2017 20:43, Springfield Harrison ha scritto: > I agree. I am all in favour of choice, but less so for duplication.
agreed. we are constantly streamlining and reducing duplication, it's an ongoing process. > I would prefer one well design, well-documented tool rather than umpteen > choices, Each of which I have to try out and evaluate. we would all love this; until we reach that stage, it is better to have alternatives to make sure users can accomplish their tasks anyway. > I find that many of the tools are poorly documented this is very much true; it's a tricky issue, and we hope to fix it for QGIS 3 > don't work intuitively this is less obvious to me: do you have specific examplese and suggestions? changing descriptions and options is easy, once we have a ceal idea on what is more intuitive for users > or don't work at all please any time you find a command which is not working, report it; if you are unsure, just write here; if you are, please open a ticket, so it can be fixed. Given your interest, are you willing to help improving the situation? Thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
