Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Also, the entire Indexing vs Storage split is somewhat hard for people > to get their heads twisted around. Not that people don't understand > the principle, just that can't comprehend the consequences, and stuck > in old ways of thinking.
The people I talked to at DevSummit had no problem understanding it, and some even saw it as a killer feature. But sure, it will be interesting to see what consequences it will have in practice. The possibilities are mindboggling, especially if one index contains references to objects from many entitystores, a la Google. > Personally, I think "adoption" is coming hand-in-hand with "Bad Times" > and "Superior Development Efficiency", since that will create business > for us who adopt, and basically out competing the legacy folks. This was precisely what [EMAIL PROTECTED] was saying, and as already noted I agree with it entirely. It's amazing what bad times can do to shift motivations. > A got a strong reaction when I responded to the "average programmer > learning this?" by saying "average programmer will be out of job"... > hinting that a much smaller set of programmers can do the same job. >:-) /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
