On 11/04/2008, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Apr 11, 2008, at 16:46 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > On 11/04/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - "There will be so many fragments, how am I going to track what I > > got in the project, let alone all the one's available in the open > > source space?" > > > > Would be cool to have something like CPAN for Qi4j fragments. > > Helps with re-use and could encourage participation - perhaps > > we could think of a cool way to search for fragments... > > What is wrong with a maven2 repository ? > Should not that do the trick. Setting up a own repos for qi4j is > pretty simple, and can be indexed by e.g. nexus to make it searchable
sure Maven2 repositories are the 'in' thing, but they have limited metadata which restricts search possibilities - artifact 'classifiers' are a workaround, but they're a known band-aid, and the Maven team are still looking into how to represent metadata properly for 2.1 (or maybe even Maven3) something like RDF could be so much better and free us from certain 'design-decisions' that come with Maven2 repositories and we could always expose a repository in the Maven2 format with a REST based approach, regardless of the physical layout just something to think about for the future, not the short-term :) > > > > > -- > > Cheers, Stuart _______________________________________________ > > > qi4j-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > -- Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
