On Monday 14 April 2008 15:36, Rickard Öberg wrote: > Why isn't it possible to use the application name as prefix? Sounds like > a matter of how the RDF is constructed/extracted more than anything > else. If you traverse the application top-down you will have the prefix > available when outputting the layer, right?
No, back to the What, Where, How... The ModuleModel can theoretically be part of many Applications. And lower down, CompositeModel are often part of many ModuleModels... It is not until they are Resolved, where you know where they are. > The problem comes when we start mixing data from many applications, > because they will all have layers called "Domain layer", but it's not > going to be the same, since they are in different applications. True. So, is the question then a matter of "Name" vs "QualifiedName" for this artifacts as well? Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
