Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Monday 14 April 2008 15:36, Rickard Öberg wrote: >> Why isn't it possible to use the application name as prefix? Sounds like >> a matter of how the RDF is constructed/extracted more than anything >> else. If you traverse the application top-down you will have the prefix >> available when outputting the layer, right? > > No, back to the What, Where, How... > > The ModuleModel can theoretically be part of many Applications. And lower > down, CompositeModel are often part of many ModuleModels... It is not until > they are Resolved, where you know where they are.
Right, so that would suggest that both styles will be used: for resolved data it will have a path, and for the models themselves they will not, and will be more like just "hanging in space", but referenced from many resolved modules. >> The problem comes when we start mixing data from many applications, >> because they will all have layers called "Domain layer", but it's not >> going to be the same, since they are in different applications. > > True. So, is the question then a matter of "Name" vs "QualifiedName" for this > artifacts as well? See above. Yeah, sort of. Resolved artifacts should have path-like names, and the models should not (I think). /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
