On Monday 14 April 2008 15:52, Rickard Öberg wrote: > Right, so that would suggest that both styles will be used: for resolved > data it will have a path, and for the models themselves they will not, > and will be more like just "hanging in space", but referenced from many > resolved modules.
Yes, see my original post; it was for bindings and models separated. However, looking further into the SPI, we have a general approach of; The Binding knows the Resolution of its container, the Resolution knows the Model of its container. meaning that from a Binding, it is currently not possible to traverse up the Binding tree, hence not possible to create the URI path. I think we need to make changes here. Possibly something wrong in the entire Model/Resolution/Binding concept. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
