On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 13:18, Richard Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be great if we could also do the same thing with Properties. Have > a @Property annotation so that we don't have to do the same thing with the > Location.name. And how about ManyAssociations?
Yeah. I thought the mail subject is clear enough. > In general, I'd like to see this be the direction things go in because the > Property<type>, Association<type> and ManyAssociation<type> have always > seemed a little invasive. Agree. Regards, Edward Yakop _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
