On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Edward Yakop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 17:56, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So the "real use-case" (once all the noise and "solutions" are filtered out) >> is; >> >> "Initialization of immutable private mixins are cumbersome and needs a >> better solution." >> >> I suspect this is currently not supported, but a lot easier to bring >> up for discussion than tossing Property out, placing implementation >> details in context interfaces and what not. > > For completeness. Query will look like this:
Is this a question or a statement, and bound to what? Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
