On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Edward Yakop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 13:18, Richard Wallace > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It would be great if we could also do the same thing with Properties. > Have > > a @Property annotation so that we don't have to do the same thing with > the > > Location.name. And how about ManyAssociations? > > Yeah. I thought the mail subject is clear enough. > Ah, so it is, heh. Sorry, it's getting late and I'm a little bleary eyed at the moment ;) > > > In general, I'd like to see this be the direction things go in because > the > > Property<type>, Association<type> and ManyAssociation<type> have always > > seemed a little invasive. > > Agree. > > Regards, > Edward Yakop > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev >
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
