On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:39, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Edward Yakop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 17:56, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> So the "real use-case" (once all the noise and "solutions" are filtered >>> out) is; >>> >>> "Initialization of immutable private mixins are cumbersome and needs a >>> better solution." >>> >>> I suspect this is currently not supported, but a lot easier to bring >>> up for discussion than tossing Property out, placing implementation >>> details in context interfaces and what not. >> >> For completeness. Query will look like this: > > Is this a question or a statement, and bound to what? It's a statement. Nothing more. Just exploring the private mixin idea for query.
Regards, Edward Yakop _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
