Hi,

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> Envisage is coming on nicely, but there is one thing that we need to
>> think more about, and that is Services vs Imported Services. For
>> Services there are tabs for
>> "General,Dependencies,Methods,State,Configuration,Usage". But for
>> ImportedServices only "General,Methods,Usage" would be relevant.
>>
>> I suggest that we add "Imported Services" as a separate "Type", apart
>> from Services, and which has tabs as above, and also an extra tab
>> "Imported by" with information about the importer that was used.
>
> Sounds about right.
>

Sure no problem, once the core have visitor for that type (Imported
Service), just let me know, I will put it into Envisage.
And how is the ordering will be ? Service, ImportedService, Entity,
Transient, Value, Object (in sorted order) ?

Also for Thien, maybe you need to prepare icon/graphics for that new
type (imported service), or do I use the same icon for service ?

Cheers
Tonny Kohar
--
KIYUT
imagine, design, create ...
http://www.kiyut.com

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to