Sounds good. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > Envisage is coming on nicely, but there is one thing that we need to > think more about, and that is Services vs Imported Services. For > Services there are tabs for > "General,Dependencies,Methods,State,Configuration,Usage". But for > ImportedServices only "General,Methods,Usage" would be relevant. > > I suggest that we add "Imported Services" as a separate "Type", apart > from Services, and which has tabs as above, and also an extra tab > "Imported by" with information about the importer that was used. > > WDYT? > > /Rickard > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev >
-- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. http://www.codedragons.com - New Energy for Projects - Great People working on Great Projects at Great Places Sent from: Cluj-napoca Cj Romania. _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
