Alex Shneyderman wrote:
Up until recently I did not believe Hibernate was even a possibility, as I thought it needed java beans to map them to DB, which are not available in QRM. This however is not a requirement as hibernate has dynamic-class (this is the old name) feature, where you can stuff a map with values of named properties and given a hibernate mapping along, Hibernate is able to persist that map. Sounds like an EntityState. Very nifty for our requirement to configure everything on-the-fly.
<snip>
Actually, that sounds like very good reasoning. Go ahead and try! If we can get Hibernate to do the heavylifting, and it works with our model, then great :-)
/Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
