On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Alex
Shneyderman<[email protected]> wrote:

> Up until recently I did not believe Hibernate was  even a possibility,
> as I thought it needed java beans to map them to DB, which are not
> available in QRM. This however is not a requirement as hibernate has
> dynamic-class (this is the old name) feature, where you can stuff a
> map with values of named properties and given a hibernate mapping
> along, Hibernate is able to persist that map. Sounds like an
> EntityState. Very nifty for our requirement to configure everything
> on-the-fly.

Ok, if this is the case it sounds reasonable.
Is this part of JPA or is it a Hibernate specific thing? It would be
'even better' if the ES is against the JPA API only (but not a
show-stopper by ay means).


Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to