On 2010-09-19 18.00, Geir Hedemark wrote:
I can't really envision a scenario where someone would take the
"risk" of going for qi4j and not be willing to upgrade to 1.6 at the
same time. 1.5 is even out of support. The customer profile you are
describing is a customer who is both willing to take risks and use
new technology, while still not being willing to take risks and
sticking with his old technology. Would you want to work with such a
customer? Whatever you guys did, it would probably not be good enough
through being too risky/too old-school. Have your pick.

It seems you are only looking at in-house development / consulting gigs above. For myself, I'm doing packaged products only, and have little to no influence over the customers' production environment, both server-wise and client-wise. Server we can always get them to upgrade to 1.6, but client is more of a company policy thing, which one product will not change.

So again, if there's no really compelling reason to move to 1.6 as base, I'd prefer not to.

/Rickard

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to