On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Stanislav Muhametsin
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Haha, that's quite pessimistic estimate. Too bad that pessimistic estimates
> are the ones which are correct. I saw "September 2010" somewhere myself, but
> since that is soon over, I'm starting to lean towards 2012 myself. Worst
> part is, the reason it is delayed (so I've read) is some (more or less)
> childish debate between Sun and Apache. I wonder if Oracle will make it stop
> and haste the release date...

I happen to be an Apache Member, and follow this case closely. It is
far from childish, as ASF only ask Sun to honor the JSPA (the
agreement that all Java Community Process members have to follow) and
not have "field of use restrictions" on their specifications.

Interestingly, Oracle (among many other Executive Committee members)
has supported ASF in the quest for this, but as they resumed control
of Java, there has not been a word on the topic, not in either
direction...

Considering Oracle's recent lawsuit on Google, I doubt that they are
now interested in providing the Java specs/tck without the field of
use restrictions.


Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to