[
http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13923#action_13923
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on QI-329:
-----------------------------------
This is actually an incorrect bug report.
I think it was covered on the mailing list in some not too distant past.
If I have
{code}
public interface DomainEvent extends ValueComposite
public interface SomeDomainEvent extends DomainEvent
{code}
then SomeDomainEvent will not be found in the lookup in the Description, even
if it is the only declared DomainEvent in the system.
I am not sure whether the current behavior is the best one, or what the
algorithm should be, but I think it needs to be discussed and contemplated a
bit further. It is also important that we make sure that all the composite meta
types behaves the same.
> ValueBuilderFactory doesn't perform correct type-to-composite lookup
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QI-329
> URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-329
> Project: Qi4j
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
> Assignee: Niclas Hedhman
>
> When doing
> {code}
> ValueBuilder<DomainEvent> builder = vbf.newValueBuilder(DomainEvent.class)
> {code}
> Type-to-Composite lookup/search is not happening.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
