[ 
http://team.ops4j.org/browse/QI-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17987#comment-17987
 ] 

Niclas Hedhman commented on QI-329:
-----------------------------------

First of all; Thanks for the analysis.

I like AmbiguousTypeException. It is fail-early style. But there was probably a 
reason why the divergence exists.

I don't have very strong opinion or informed guess what is the best way 
forward. And when in doubt, be restrictive, has been the motto in Qi4j. So, I 
lean towards making Entities behave exactly like the others do now. 

Services have special treatment, and I think that should remain as is.
                
> ValueBuilderFactory doesn't perform correct type-to-composite lookup
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QI-329
>                 URL: http://team.ops4j.org/browse/QI-329
>             Project: Qi4j
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Runtime
>            Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
>             Fix For: 2.0 - Reductionism
>
>
> When doing 
> {code}
> ValueBuilder<DomainEvent> builder = vbf.newValueBuilder(DomainEvent.class)
> {code}
> Type-to-Composite lookup/search is not happening.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
http://team.ops4j.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to