JIRA did not forward this comment to the list (file attachment with
comment).
I tried to constraint Entities type lookup but then many SDK tests fail.
See the attached reports.
Attached reports can be found on the issue page:
http://team.ops4j.org/browse/QI-329
/Paul
Niclas Hedhman (Commented) (JIRA) a écrit :
[
http://team.ops4j.org/browse/QI-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17987#comment-17987
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on QI-329:
-----------------------------------
First of all; Thanks for the analysis.
I like AmbiguousTypeException. It is fail-early style. But there was probably a
reason why the divergence exists.
I don't have very strong opinion or informed guess what is the best way
forward. And when in doubt, be restrictive, has been the motto in Qi4j. So, I
lean towards making Entities behave exactly like the others do now.
Services have special treatment, and I think that should remain as is.
ValueBuilderFactory doesn't perform correct type-to-composite lookup
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: QI-329
URL: http://team.ops4j.org/browse/QI-329
Project: Qi4j
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core Runtime
Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
Fix For: 2.0 - Reductionism
When doing
{code}
ValueBuilder<DomainEvent> builder = vbf.newValueBuilder(DomainEvent.class)
{code}
Type-to-Composite lookup/search is not happening.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
http://team.ops4j.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
