[
http://team.ops4j.org/browse/QI-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17460#comment-17460
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on QI-361:
-----------------------------------
I am not sure what you mean by "State that is not stored in Properties and
Associations". That is exactly the proper State model in Qi4j, and other
members in Mixin implementations are simply not "state" as such. And for
Values, I would like to enforce that Value Mixin implementation fields are
'final' or otherwise instantiation fails, BUT I am not sure yet whether that is
too strict or not, for instance it would make Initializable more or less
meaningless for Values.
> "ValueBuilder instances can not be reused."
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QI-361
> URL: http://team.ops4j.org/browse/QI-361
> Project: Qi4j
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core Runtime
> Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
> Fix For: 2.0 - Reductionism
>
>
> If you try to use the same ValueBuilder as a cookie-cutter for similar
> values, you will receive the error;
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: ValueBuilder instances cannot be reused
> This defeats the purpose of having the methods prototype() and prototypeFor().
> So, either the names need to change (I don't like that), or the previous
> behavior of prototype instantiation should be supported.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
http://team.ops4j.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
