On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:56:30 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:40:14AM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> .../...
> > - Linux kernel v2.4.23 (with cryptoloop and supermount patches).
> wrt supermount, did you look at http://submount.sourceforge.net/?

Interesting, but it is still in alpha state, while supermount is
well tested and in MAndrake production kernels for years (so it's
unlikely a major bug was missed)...

Otherwise, from the user point of view, submount and supermount seem
pretty much equivalent.

I did bookmark the page for submount though. Time will tell if it's
worth replacing supermount with it.


Reply via email to