On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:56:30 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:40:14AM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote: > > .../... > > - Linux kernel v2.4.23 (with cryptoloop and supermount patches). > > wrt supermount, did you look at http://submount.sourceforge.net/?
Interesting, but it is still in alpha state, while supermount is well tested and in MAndrake production kernels for years (so it's unlikely a major bug was missed)... Otherwise, from the user point of view, submount and supermount seem pretty much equivalent. I did bookmark the page for submount though. Time will tell if it's worth replacing supermount with it. Thierry.
