Yes, but as standard QLs can't have split tx and rx devices (STX and SRX I think SMSQ/E calls them) you would need something like Hans Peter Recktenwald's SIMSER extensions for standard QDOS QLs to be able to cope.
The real challenge with a QL is understanding the serial port cablings, since ser1 and ser2 are not wired the same way. And remember that sernet has to be configured right too. (Don't know why I'm getting involved with this, getting involved in queries regarding Sernet or Printing or Pointer Environment has always been never ending, hence why I got rid of my DJC phone number to get some peace and quiet in the evenings). Dilwyn Jones ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Mellor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 7:27 PM Subject: Re: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict... > On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 20:13:19 +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 26 Nov 2004 at 13:30, Rich Mellor wrote: > > > >> No idea - I never owned it alas - guess a serial lead was supplied with > >> the package > > > > In that case, use sernet to transfer the files.... > > It wouldn't be slower than the slaving prog... > > > > Wolfgang > > ---------------------------------------- > > www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > QL-Users Mailing List > > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm > > > > > > Except for two things... > > 1) Is there a version of sernet for standard (QDOS) QLs ? > 2) You lose the header on files without some software to store it and > retrieve it automatically (or using ZIP) > > -- > Rich Mellor > RWAP Services > 26 Oak Road, Shelfield, Walsall, West Midlands WS4 1RQ > > http://www.rwapservices.co.uk/ > > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
