On 13 Jan 2005 at 12:04, P Witte wrote: > Is there any reason why the job cant be born as a confirmed Thing user, ie > it doesnt have to take any specific action to use the Thing when it starts > up. Let the setup routine (currently EX) sort it all out before handing over > to the job?
No reason at all other than my pigheadedness, in not seeing why a job would continue using a thing when it isn't needed any more. Wolfgang. ---------------------------------------- www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
