In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Gilpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>----- Original Message ----- >From: "Wolfgang Lenerz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM >Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the "Traditional" QUANTA Committee > > >> gwicks wrote : >>> Sorry, John, but you are missing the point. In this case Quanta should >>> not >>> have needed a request. There are times when Quanta needs to take an >>> initiative, >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> Geoff >>> >> I'm not so sure I agree with you there. >> You can't expect Quanta to contact all those with potential projects. >> Surely it would be more reasonable for that person to contact Quanta? >> >> Wolfgang > >Gosh, so QUANTA is not talking a language that nobody else understands - I >was beginning to wonder!! Thanks Wolfgang for your interpretation of my past >few emails. > >Still listening in. > >John Gilpin. On the other hand, there could be a middle ground where Quanta could put forward the interests and views of its members. Determined from its own correspondence with members, magazines articles, meetings, etc. So, developments in the area of a replacement / enhancement for Gold Card and Super Card, a USB device connection ability, etc. Could be prompted for. That way a developer can see some interest to be fulfilled -- Malcolm Cadman _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
