Hi George,

The problem that David has seems to be not present when using Linux, so 
it could be related to SMSQ/E or programs that run in SMSQ/E. I have 
checked my Q60 and there seems to be no problems with the hardware clock.

I suppose QDOS Classic could be loaded to see if that makes any difference.

Does SMSQ/E have a software clock that is independent from the hardware 
clock.

Derek


George Gwilt wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2007, at 20:51, David Gilham wrote:
>
>   
>> I seem to have an unusual problem with respect to the clock
>> on my Q60 system.
>> The system is
>> Q60 60mhz
>> 64M ram as seen by SMSQE
>> 128M Physical memory
>> SMSQE v 3.13 as assembled from sources.
>> The problem is not with the hardware clock.
>> but apparently with SMSQE.
>> On boot up of the machine I normally print the date and time
>> and a simple menu asking whether I want SMSQE or Linux.
>> The Time is more or less accurate.
>> If I boot into SMSQE and let the system run for a reasonable
>> time printing date$ seems to indicate that the clock is losing  
>> seconds at
>> an large rate ,apparently 1 minute per hour. This was so whether I  
>> typed Prot_date 1 or prot_date 0 immediatly after a normal boot.
>> If I do a soft reset the time display and hence the clock reverts  
>> to a more or less accurate value. I am baffled by this. Cursory  
>> looking at the SMSQE
>> sources seems not to  reveal what is going wrong but either my  
>> system is playing up or there maybe timing problems in SMSQE.
>> Has anyone else noticed this problem or have any idea of how to fix  
>> it.
>> A temporary fix would involve a polled task but much better would be
>> in the operating sytem itself.
>>
>>     
>
> My Q60 is now about 9 minutes fast. The time was changed certainly  
> over a month a go. So my Q60 has a much smaller timing error.
>
> George
> _______________________________________________
> QL-Users Mailing List
> http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
>
> --
> This email has been verified as Virus free
> Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net
>
>   
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to