You know, QUANTA is always prepared to listen to anyone with a serious 
proposition, it's just it's membership who don't seem to have that many 
propositions for us to listen to!! This is quite different to QUANTA never 
listening and when we have listened, we then decide our further actions if 
any.

We don't claim any praise for robbing Dilwyn from QLToday - after all, it 
was GW's suggestion and we are grateful for it. {:-))

Regards,

John Gilpin.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Geoff Wicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] News Editor


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Roy wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 3:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] News Editor
>
>>>
>>>As you know this was our suggestion and we are grateful to the Quanta
>>>committee for taking it seriously.
>>>
>>>Very cheeky of them to pinch our ex-editor, but a masterstroke that even 
>>>I
>>>had not thought of.
>> Hang on a moment. How can this be your suggestion if you hadn't thought
>> of it. involuntary suggestion can be dangerous - keep taking the pills!
>> -- 
>
> What a good opportunity to remind everyone what QL Today's attitude is:
>
> "QL Today believes in healthy competition and we would like to see the
> Quanta committee set up a news service, both in print and on the web, to
> rival that of ours."
>
> Editorial vol 11 issue 5 page 3
>
> Quanta's members jeered at this suggestion at the Hove AGM, but Quanta's
> committee did not,
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Geoff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QL-Users Mailing List
> http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm 

_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to