In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tobias Fröschle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Malcolm Cadman schrieb: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Phillips >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering what the actual performance of QPC2 is like when running >> on WIN XP on the Asus PC ( which has Linux "flavour" as a basic OS ). >> >> I have QPC2 running on a PC with WIN XP ... so, just what is the >> comparison. >> >> May be those trying this out can write an article for QL Today or Quanta >> magazines ( or both ) ... ? >> >Malcolm, >I haven't seen your questions answered for some time now. So I'll give >it a try: >Today,I threw linux from my eeePC's disks and replaced it with >you-know-what only for one single reason: QPC - uqlx on linux is fine, >but it doesn't come near QPC..... >To your question: >I have QPC running on two boxes now: >- a 1.8G FSC laptop with 2GB RAM >- the eeePC, expanded to 1GB RAM >To my astonishment: There's not much of a difference - QPC on the eeepc >"feels" just like on the "big" laptop. I didn't try, however, with the >original half gig. >So, nothing to bother regarding speed. > >Regards >Tobias Hi Tobias, Thanks for the report back. It does seem that the eeepc is becoming a useful basis for running alternative OS's on. Any chance of you writing something about your experiences for either QL Today or Quanta magazine ... or both ..... ? -- Malcolm Cadman _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
