Hi Geoff,
I see you have been answered already with several legally based opinions. The problem with your question is that it is not factually valid. It states that there definitely has been a breach of the constitution. To establish that as a fact rather than opinion you will need to get a judicial review. Do you think that this will be a good use of Quanta's time and money? As to the now hypothetical cheque, as the club rules regarding the status of the individual had been interpreted that the individual was correctly appointed, if the cheque was signed by the individual in the honest belief that they had the right to do so and the cheque was honoured by the club in the honest belief that the individual had the right to sign the cheque and there was no evidence of fraud in the criminal sense in the use of the cheque then the simple answer is yes and should any redress be needed should there have been an honest mis-interpretation of rules this should be sought within the rules of the club in the first instance. Duncan -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Wicks <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:24 Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Finally a reply - from the Treasurer -------------------------------------------------- From: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 7:49 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Finally a reply - from the Treasurer > Hi Geoff, > > Suggest you look up transactional analysis in google especially critical > > parent and willful child roles. > > In law in the UK there is a differentiation between criminal and civil > law. > Any perceived violations of Quanta's constitution will fall in to > civil > law, unless you are suggesting fraud according to the criminal > definition > of this. If not then if there is a legal case to be made > because of some > injury, someone, an individual or group of individuals, > needs to sue. It > seems on this list at the moment only you feel there is a > case to be made. > The question then is are you going to sue Quanta. If not > then what is your > purpose. > Answer a simple question, but the answer has to be not as a layman would answer but as a lawyer would answer: Can a person who has been appointed treasurer of Quanta in a breach of the constitution - a legally binding document - legally sign cheques under British law? Best Wishes, Geoff _____ _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
