All the emulators can be reconfigured to cover most of the hardware out there. Therefore I treated emulators ad two product lines: free, and commercial. Actual al hardware is by definition less configurable so it's definition is more fixed. It pays to tunnel deeper there, as people will be inclined to emulate their "ideal" sytdm and we need to know what that is in practice.
Hope this clears up why I structured it the way I did. As I said in a previous post, the next survey will be much more focused on who uses the system and how they use them - ANC that survey will obviously appear to have an emulator and software bias. Dave Sent from my Verizon iPhone. On Feb 13, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Marcel Kilgus <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://www.kwiksurveys.com/online-survey.php?surveyID=IIMDML_e8265930 > > Hmm, somewhat hardware biased for my taste. Given that QPC was in > recent years probably the most widely used QL platforms of all, it > seems a bit strange to have it simply referred to as just "A > commercial software emulator". > > Marcel > > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
