gdgqler wrote: >> In fact it's now the other way round, there is no native hardware that >> can match QPC in speed or features. That's why I was a bit mystified >> by your choices. Just saying. > One interesting, and useful, thing about QPC2 is that it emulates a > better 68000 series Motorola chip than actually exists. It combines features > of several.
Not least thanks to you :-) Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
