Plastic wrote: > Software is simple to duplicate, and it does not wear out.
Not entirely correct, software often has to be updated when new operating systems (i.e. Windows) are released, but okay, I get your point ;) > That said, QPC runs all the same software as all the other options. When > asking what software people want, you have to first know what hardware > people want to run it on. But isn't this my point? QPC *is* a "hardware" (or rather "target") platform in this sense. And there is often a *huge* difference, software wise, if my software has to run on QPC, QL2K, uQLx or QemuLator. > Once you're looking at an emulator, any emulator, that part of the > question answers itself. No, not really. There are emulators running QDOS and there are emulators running SMSQ/E. And that's only where the differences start. But I don't want to drag this argument out any further, I hope I made my point and that's okay then. > There will be some specific questions about QPC in the next survey, > but I am confident they won't tell the QPC devs anything new The QPC dev team consists of one person, namely me, just FYI ;-) Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
