--------------------------------------------------
From: "gdgqler" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 3:11 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quorums
On 23 Mar 2011, at 14:12, Geoff Wicks wrote:
Finally thanks to everyone who has replied. Unless there are postings to
the contrary the consensus appears to be clear,
Good. But what exactly is the consensus? I've forgotten already.
There seems to be a general agreement that John Mason was wrong to suggest
that proxy votes count towards the quorum. If someone thinks otherwise,
please come with your arguments.
There is also a suggestion of some form of internet/telephone participation
in the AGM. That idea is being worked on already.
Quanta Committee, get your IT experts in the starting blocks,
Best Wishes,
Geoff
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
