On 26 Mar 2011, at 17:44, paul wrote: > On 3/25/2011 3:09 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> Send Ql-Users mailing list submissions to > > >> Message: 1 >> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:52:22 +0000 >> From: Malcolm Cadman<[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quorums >> Message-ID:<[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed > >> In message<[email protected]>, Rich Mellor >> <[email protected]> writes > >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "John Taylor"<[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:18 PM >>> To:<[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quorums > >>> On 22 Mar 2011, at 16:57, Geoff Wicks wrote: > >>>> A Quanta member has sent the committee some suggestions for >>>> amending the constitution to provide for the situation where an AGM >>>> is inquorate. > >>>> I raised this question at the 2008 AGM and John Mason said that >>>> "proxy votes count towards a quorum". (The quotation comes from the >>>> minutes of the meeting.) I tend to disagree with John on this >>>> point, but I am unable to prove that he is wrong. Equally I am >>>> unable to prove that he is right. > > What does Robert's Rules of Order have to say on this matter?? > > http://www.robertsrules.org/ >
The quorum refers to the number present, not to the number voting. George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
