SpecBAS does sound like something you cough up

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Marcos Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:

> En/Je/On 2012-02-28 09:10, Malcolm Lear escribió / skribis / wrote :
>
> > On 27/02/2012 12:38, Marcos Cruz wrote:
> > >I forgot to mention the SpecBAS project by Paul Dunn (
> http://specbas.co.uk).
>
> > Its interesting it support procedures and functions the same way as
> > SBasic. Clearly the author has used a QL.
>
> I'm not sure about that. I think the main influence comes from an old good
> alternative BASIC for ZX Spectrum: Beta BASIC by Andy Wright (and its
> descendants SAM BASIC and MasterBASIC for the SAM CoupƩ, by the same
> Author).
>
> The proc syntax is almost the same, though Beta BASIC do it better: it
> calls
> procs by name (like S*BASIC), while SpecBAS needs the word PROC. The DO
> LOOP
> structures are also the same; though Beta BASIC do it better too: it lets
> UNTIL and WHILE at both DO and LOOP in any possible combination, while
> SpecBAS
> so far only lets "DO WHILE - LOOP" or "DO -- LOOP UNTIL".
>
> Remember SpecBAS is still alpha and evolving. It seems it will become a
> useful
> and multiplatform language -- with a nice retro feeling.
>
> Marcos
>
> --
> http://programandala.net
> _______________________________________________
> QL-Users Mailing List
> http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
>
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to