On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Peter Graf via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:
> Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote: > > > What are the frames per second and number of lines in the image? > > Originally 72 Hz, 512 visible lines. Even just counting the visible pixels, the upgrade position looks untenable. 512x256x72 = 9,437,184 dot clock 800x600x50 = 28,800,000 " 800x600x25 = 14,400,000 " 1080x720x30 = 19,440,000 " 1080x720x15 = 9,720,000 " 1080x720x12 = 9,331,200 " Hmmm, I see the limitation... It strikes me that 1080P at half intended frame rate, then externally frame doubling using new hardware on the output would give 1080P/24, /25 or /30, but... It requires an external frame doubler. That could be as simple as a pair of FIFOs and a small CPLD though. I wonder if 12fps would cause people to complain about responsiveness during online gaming ;) -- Dave Park d...@sinclairql.com _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List
