As long as you don't use decimal places you can consider that reals in SBasic are long integers (even if they always have a two bytes mantissa) -----Message d'origine----- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : jeudi 21 juin 2001 11:42 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Hello, I would have liked to have 32-bit integer variables in SBASIC. The Acorn Atom I believe had 32-bit integers (but no floats unless you bought the add-on ROM). Ian.
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Marcel Kilgus
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Mel LaVerne
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Mel LaVerne
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Tony Firshman
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Richard Zidlicky
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Dilwyn Jones
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Malcolm Lear
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Malcolm Lear
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Malcolm Lear
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Malcolm Lear
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop John Hitchcock