Tony Firshman wrote: > I was falling asleep during the presentation ( very late to bed the > previous night) - maybe someone else can remember the relevance? He needs the SMSQ pipes and job events. While the first could surly be done under Minerva, the latter one IIRC can only be done through a new PE version (which sounds quite unlikely for me). Marcel
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Dave Walker
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Steve Howe
- [ql-users] Q40/Q60 Giorgio Garabello
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Laurence Reeves
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Tony Firshman
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Marcel Kilgus
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Mel LaVerne
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Mel LaVerne
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Tony Firshman
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Richard Zidlicky
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
