Yes, but why speed is more impressive on PC : a Basic program compiled with Turbo Basic (486 processor) is much faster than the equivalent on QPC2 (wich is twice fast as an Aurora board ...) -----Message d'origine----- De : Jerome Grimbert (...)
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 relea... Claude Mourier 00
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 relea... Phoebus Dokos
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Thierry Godefroy
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 relea... Phoebus Dokos
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Marcel Kilgus
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 relea... Claude Mourier 00
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Phoebus Dokos
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 relea... Claude Mourier 00
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 relea... Claude Mourier 00
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 relea... Jerome Grimbert
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 relea... Claude Mourier 00
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 relea... Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Tony Firshman