On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 at 08:41:08, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: <3BB2E624.20478.89797@localhost>)
>On 25 Sep 2001, at 17:01, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
>I presume (but have never tested) that a program compiled under
>Turbo might still be a little faster - Turbo always produced faster
>(but less copatible) code than Qlib...
Yep. What I liked about QLIB was that it failed to compile practically
nothing. It even added END DEFs etc to try to make sense of bad code.
Turbo not only required absolutely correct syntax, but reused to accept
some correct ones..... but was faster.
In most cases, compiling was the important issue, not speed.
OK it is much better now of course with the new release.
--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
