In message <007801c19eab$4212a940$36b4fea9@johns>, John Hitchcock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>. Yuuuuck. (Ok, I don't sound like Nasta. He wouldn't say
>"Yuck" when 500 words would do ;)
>=========================
>A trades-union convenor once famously said *something*(!) like -
>"The lads deserve every explanation they can get; and more if they can get
>them..."
>
>Be assured Nasta that some of us *need* your 500 - and more if we can get
>it!

Help ... :-) ... how will I summarise it all ?

-- 
Malcolm Cadman

Reply via email to