At 11:48 PM 1/31/2002 -0500, you wrote: >I was wondering if there was a way to change or "enhance" standard S*Basic >commands. > >I'm pretty sure that this is impossible from Basic but what about machine >code... for example instead of writing an x_Print x,w,z,d,s command, >redefine the standard Print command to be extended (I suppose that there >MUST be a way to do this, as TK2 for example does it)
I think what you are getting at is that TK2 takes the original definition of, say EXEC, to include the option of having arguments, i.e. EXEC foo;"bar". I believe how this is done is that TK2 includes a resident procedure called EXEC and this newer EXEC takes precedence over the older definition in the name table. I hope I interpreted your question and I hope I'm right in my answer. Tim Swenson
