Mike wrote: >I agree entirely with Bill, having spent many thousands of pounds >running several businesses with QLs and SMSQ/E, including Q40. We >stopped because of the lack of development keeping pace with the >market. I was delighted when SMSQ/E was made open source, and >looked forward to a revival in QL fortunes, alas, this is not so, >its not to be open source, which is more to do with vested >interests trying to 'grab the ball', than with what will be best >for QL users, and th QL.
I hereby state that I don't try to grab SMSQ/E and will agree to the usual existing OpenSource licenses. Furthermore I offer to pay a substantial amount of money if SMSQ/E becomes free for all. The only thing I ask for, is to give the non-commercial developers we need for Q40 and Q60 a *real* opportunity to do their work! Peter
