P Witte wrote:
>Richard Zidlicky writes:
>
>>lack of foresight? We are at version 2.98 now, the sources Wolfgang
>>received are already different from 2.98 so they would have to be
>>called 2.99 if they were released as a version. So the next bugfix
>>after that will cause version 3.00 to be released? Many programs
>>expect the version to be a plain long word so you can't easilly
>>call it 2.99a or something like that.
>>
>
>How about 2$64 ;)
>
>Per
>
>
>
>What about 2.99, 2.A0, 2.A1 ,2.A2 ........all the way to 2.FF?
>
Nothing wrong with putting a little Hex on it to stay in space.
Lafe McCorkle
>
>
