On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:44:29AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I'm afraid that the discussion about GPL (and whether I know it or
> > not) will lead us too far astray. Let's just say that I will abide by my
> > opinion on it.
>
> you do not have an opinion on it. You just plainly refuse to think
> about a reasonable license.
Then went on to say:
> Perhaps we would get a bit futher with more humor. However, simply
> laughing at someones arguments isn't the way to convince me, quite
> the opposite - especially since you have left a whole bunch of my
> arguments simply unanswered.
Richard,
It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong, or if you have a better way or
not. If you in one breath dismiss out of hand what someone's saying, and
moments later say laughing at someone's arguments isn't a way to convince
you, well, that comes across very strangely...
Just to crystalise the issue, what exactly are you losing under the
proposed revised license? I can see what you'd gain (access to the source,
ability to contribute to SMSQ's source directly, etc) but what do you
lose? You couldn't do this before, so I'm at a loss to see how you'd be
worse off...
Dave
