> > Just to crystalise the issue, what exactly are you losing under the > proposed revised license? I can see what you'd gain (access to the source, > ability to contribute to SMSQ's source directly, etc) but what do you > lose? You couldn't do this before, so I'm at a loss to see how you'd be > worse off... >
Dave, Richard felt as some others : > I do firmly believe that this *was* the chance to overcome the > split between QDOS, Minerva, QDOS Classic and SMSQ. We have to accept this unique license or ignore SMSQ. Some will participate and some will not. It is troubling that the developers of the most advanced QL hardware system feel locked out but maybe once we see what happens feelings can be soothed and solutions worked out. If there is a comspiracy it is a comspiracy in a teapot that affects no more than 300 people on the planet. This has been beat to death and we all have our own opinions by now so lets move on. I am interested to see what happens next. -- Bill
