That is THE good opinion: please stop to suspect everybody of conspiracy or corruption or what... this LICENCE driven by Wolf and other historical supporters is the right way !
Jean-Louis DIANOUX ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Cable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] This is the LICENCE > > > > > Just to crystalise the issue, what exactly are you losing under the > > proposed revised license? I can see what you'd gain (access to the source, > > ability to contribute to SMSQ's source directly, etc) but what do you > > lose? You couldn't do this before, so I'm at a loss to see how you'd be > > worse off... > > > > Dave, > > Richard felt as some others : > > > I do firmly believe that this *was* the chance to overcome the > > split between QDOS, Minerva, QDOS Classic and SMSQ. > > We have to accept this unique license or ignore SMSQ. Some will participate and > some will not. It is troubling that the developers of the most advanced QL > hardware system feel locked out but maybe once we see what happens feelings can > be soothed and solutions worked out. If there is a comspiracy it is a comspiracy > in a teapot that affects no more than 300 people on the planet. This has been > beat to death and we all have our own opinions by now so lets move on. I am > interested to see what happens next. > > -- Bill >
