On 28/10/02 at 18:30 Dave P wrote:

>Maybe I wasn't clear... :o)
>...
> If we had a really compact embedded board with serial/IR keyboard/
> programming in BASIC (a bit like a super BASIC STAMP module, but
> more powerful ;) it could sell by the bucketload.

PRECISELY!!!!
This is THE market for QL-like hardware and SMSQ. I have looked through
various offerings in this area and even with Mot. (in all their 'wisdom')
making undue problems with 68k/MCF availability, a 'QL-stamp' would win
hands down just on the strength of (a) Sbasic (b) multitasking. Heck, I
would be buying them right now.
It's only a pity that Mot. decided to deprive us of the component most
suited for a 'QL-stamp' - the 68306 (IIRC). The closest to it right now are
the Dragonballs (68328 in all it's versions). There is one V2 coldfire that
could do the trick too, and although not completely compatible with 68k,
this is a case where it would not be a great problem as it would not run
any of the traditional QL apps (so the SMSQ/QDOS/Minerva source could just
be recompiled via microAPL's cross-compiler), but in this case the benefit
to the community is not very big, unless a way is found to funnel the
financial proceeds back into it.

Nasta

        • ... Stephen Meech
  • ... RWAPSoftware
  • ... Ian . Pine
    • ... QL recursos en castellano
  • ... Ian . Pine
    • ... Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος
  • ... Norman Dunbar

Reply via email to