On 6 Nov 2002, at 21:23, dndsystems1 wrote: > That is the wrong address you fool and you know it.
Hmm, it's the address YOU use to post on here. Since it is foolish to use - what? > Do you think I > have not searched through that address, you have been informed of the > correct address to use but you will not use it, why? Even now you have > not contacted me on the D&D address but you have had me waiting for > over a week expecting it to come in, what can I do if you will not > send it. Everyone else around the world contacts us but you do not > know how to do it. YOU HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR A WEEK? Ha! This is so ridiculous, it had me laughing for a minute. Let's set seom things straight, hmmm? First of all, I don't have to contact you. YOU have to initiate contact - after all, YOU are selling something that doesn't belong to you. Second I contaced you at the email address you used here in this list. Reply : silence. Third, I replied to an email (in JULY!) sent to me privately on a totally other matter by Derek, asking about this. Reply: silence. Fourth, after Tony Firshman made enormous efforts to get to you, Derek finally emailed me, giving me a choice of 2 email addresses. I used the first one he gave me. I sent you (D&D) a long email to that address, containing a copy of the one I later sent to the list,and telling you that I intened to put this email on the list. reply : achnowledgement of receipt - then silence. About a week later, I reminded you and asked for your reply. Reply : please use "proper channels". Guess what - at that time, I thought that the proper channel was this here list. > > I have contatced DEREK on the email he GAVE me for > > correspondence on this matter. > > > > You have had a copy of this email for a week on this. > > If you want to deny this, that's fine by me. > > > > > Licence money has been paid. > > TO WHOM? > > WHEN? (no reply here...) > > > > >I have replied to Tony Tebby's email (to > > > me) and I am now waiting for the return reply. > > > > Hmm, that's NOT what Tony said to me. > > > > > > > > We have sold machines that do not have SMSQ/E - they boot into > QDOS > > > Classic instead but then you already know that fact?? > > > > On ROM? (no reply here) (...) > > > > If you sell SMSQ/E without a licence you are breaking the law - not > > me as you are trying to make out. > > > > Wolfgang > > Derek does not deal with this, that is why I asked him to point you to > me _after_ Tony Firshman assured me email(s) were coming in my > direction but they never did, did they? Why do youask Derek to point me to you - why don't you contact me, Are you trying to say that Derek never mlentioned my emails to you? > Whatever is said from now on I am going to offer you an olive branch - > do you understand? - you nicely email me with your concerns and I will > work through them with you. You must know the correct address by now, > just use it. It's the one you have use in this list, of course, isn't it? Please note that these are not my concerns, but yours. You are breaking tha if you are selling SMSQ/E without any licence. Wolfgang
