Hello, I've just installed qmail-scanner-1.20st and was looking at my /var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-queue.log file to see the difference when I turn on the minidebug option. I was alarmed to see scan times for certain functions ranging into tens of seconds. Can anyone here let me know what to make of this?
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:48 -0500:5085: +++ starting debugging for process 5085 by uid=100 Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:48 -0500:5085: w_c: elapsed time from start 9.68652 secs Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:48 -0500:5085: return-path='[EMAIL PROTECTED]', recips='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:48 -0500:5085: from='', subj='test from leasecorp', via SMTP from 66.207.107.133 Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:48 -0500:5085: clamscan: finished scan in 0.004038 secs Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:48 -0500:5085: SA: finished scan in 0.560265 secs - hits=2.4 Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:48 -0500:5085: p_s: finished scan in 0.004445 secs Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:48 -0500:5085: ini_sc: finished scan of "/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/cygnus.quarry.com10741090085475085"... Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:48 -0500:5085: ini_sc: elapsed time from start 10.266434 secs Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:58 -0500:5085: ------ all finished. Total of 10.295683 secs I'm not sure what part of the process ini_sc and w_c represent. I was able to deduce that p_s is perlscanner and it looks like it's doing its job nice and quick. >From the looks of it the w_c function is holding up the show. Your help is greatly appreciated, James ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
